Compare / Heroku vs Azure App Service

Heroku vs Azure App Service

Pre-calculated from hand-checked data — Heroku checked 2026-08-06, Azure App Service checked 2026-08-06.

The short version

Heroku wins more of our comparison points, but Azure App Service still fits if teams in the Microsoft ecosystem — .NET shops, enterprise-adjacent projects, or anyone whose employer already pays for Azure describes you.

Price Heroku

Heroku is cheaper at every stage we model — about $50/mo even for a growing project.

Ease Heroku

Heroku is easier to get running: git push heroku main; buildpacks detect the stack and the platform handles the rest.

Free tier Azure App Service

Azure App Service has a free tier; Heroku doesn't.

Features Tie

Feature coverage is even: each wins 3 of the 15 rows we track.

What developers say about this matchup

We couldn't find a substantive first-person discussion comparing this exact pair. We leave the section empty instead of filling it with vendor marketing or generic SEO comparisons.

At a glance

Heroku Azure App Service
Best for Teams that already know Heroku and value its mature workflow over price. Teams in the Microsoft ecosystem — .NET shops, enterprise-adjacent projects, or anyone whose employer already pays for Azure.
How deploys work git push heroku main; buildpacks detect the stack and the platform handles the rest. Connect GitHub Actions from the portal, push to a local git remote, or run `az webapp up` — runtime stacks for Node, Python, .NET, PHP, and Java are built in.
The tradeoff You pay a platform premium — comparable raw compute costs a third as much elsewhere. Capable and git-friendly, but you pay PaaS prices per plan and navigate the most complicated tier system here.
Free tier None F1 Free tier: 1 GB RAM, 60 CPU-minutes/day, no custom domain or SLA. Plus a $200/30-day new-account credit.

What you'd realistically pay

$5 $13.14 $25 $32 $50 $84 Just starting Steady traffic Growing
Heroku Azure App Service
Estimated monthly cost at each project stage. Estimates use each provider's real plans; euro prices are compared at a rough exchange rate.
Project stage Heroku Azure App Service Cheaper
Just starting ≈$5/mo Eco — One Eco dyno (512 MB) that sleeps after 30 idle minutes; an always-on Basic dyno is $7, and an Essential-0 Postgres adds $5. ≈$13.14/mo B1 Basic (Linux) — 1 core, 1.75 GB RAM, 10 GB storage, custom domains and SSL, 99.95% SLA. West Europe pricing. Heroku
Steady traffic ≈$25/mo Standard-1X — Adds horizontal scaling and zero-downtime deploys; database still extra. ≈$32/mo B1 + managed PostgreSQL — ~$13 B1 Linux plus ~$19 for the cheapest PostgreSQL Flexible Server (B1ms + 32 GiB storage). Heroku
Growing ≈$50/mo Standard dynos + add-ons — Two Standard-1X dynos; realistic totals depend heavily on add-ons. ≈$84/mo P0v3 + managed PostgreSQL — ~$65 Premium P0v3 (1 vCPU, 4 GB, autoscale and slots) plus ~$19 for managed PostgreSQL. Heroku

Heroku pricing notes

  • Dynos are prorated to the second up to the monthly maximum.
  • Heroku Postgres starts at $5/month (Essential-0, 1 GB storage); the Redis-compatible Key-Value Store starts at $3/month (Mini, 25 MB).

Azure App Service pricing notes

  • Prices are West Europe, per App Service Plan (~730 h/month); they vary by region.
  • Windows plans cost roughly 4× Linux at the Basic tier because the license is baked in.
  • Bandwidth: first 100 GB/month free, then about $0.087/GB.
  • Savings plans and reservations cut Premium prices by up to ~55%.

Our ratings

Ease of use Heroku

Heroku 4/5
Azure App Service 3/5

Pricing clarity Heroku

Heroku 4/5
Azure App Service 2/5

Free tier Azure App Service

Heroku 1/5
Azure App Service 3/5

Scaling

Heroku 4/5
Azure App Service 4/5

Control

Heroku 3/5
Azure App Service 3/5

Feature by feature

Heroku wins 3, Azure App Service wins 3, with 9 even.

Deploy workflow

Heroku Azure App Service
Deploy from Git push Yes git push heroku main is the original deploy story; GitHub integration too. Yes GitHub Actions wired from the portal, local git push, or ZIP deploy.
Preview deploys Yes Review Apps create a running app per pull request. Partial Deployment slots (Standard tier and up) give staging environments, but no automatic PR previews.
Official CLI Yes The heroku CLI covers deploys, logs, scaling, and add-ons. Yes `az webapp up` deploys an app in one command.
Instant rollbacks Yes heroku releases:rollback reverts to any previous release instantly. Partial Slot swaps revert instantly on Standard+; Basic and Free redeploy the old build instead.

Platform

Heroku Azure App Service
Custom domains + HTTPS Yes Custom domains with automated certificate management on paid dynos. Yes Custom domains with managed certificates from the B1 tier up.
Built-in CDN / edge network No No built-in CDN — pair with Cloudflare or Fastly yourself. Partial Azure Front Door / CDN integrate but are separate billed services.
Serverless functions No Dynos are long-running processes; there is no function product. Partial Azure Functions is a sibling product and can even run on the same plan, but it is not part of App Service itself.
Docker containers Yes Deploy container images through the Heroku container registry. Yes Custom containers are first-class on Linux plans.
SSH / shell access Partial heroku run bash gives a one-off shell in a fresh dyno, not the live one. Partial Browser and CLI SSH into the app container — not a VM you own.
EU hosting region Yes Common Runtime offers a Europe region at the same prices. Yes West Europe, North Europe, Germany, France, Sweden, Poland, Italy, Spain, and more.

Runtime & operations

Heroku Azure App Service
Automatic scaling Partial Built-in autoscaling requires Performance-tier dynos; standard dynos scale manually. Partial Rule-based autoscale from the Standard tier; smarter automatic scaling needs Premium.
Scale to zero Partial Eco dynos sleep after 30 idle minutes; Basic and Standard run continuously. No Paid plans bill continuously; only the free F1 tier unloads idle apps (with cold starts).
Scheduled jobs Yes Heroku Scheduler (free add-on) runs tasks on a schedule. Yes WebJobs run scheduled and background tasks inside the plan.
Managed database Yes Heroku Postgres and Key-Value Store are fully managed add-ons. Yes Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL from ~$19/month, plus SQL Database and Cosmos DB.
Logs & metrics built in Partial Log stream and basic metrics included; serious monitoring means add-ons. Yes Application Insights is deeply integrated — but ingestion bills per GB.

Watch out for

Heroku

  • There is no free tier.
  • Compute is expensive for what you get: Standard-1X costs $25/month for 512 MB of RAM.
  • Databases and other add-ons bill separately and can dominate the total.

Azure App Service

  • A Windows B1 plan costs ~$55/month versus ~$13 for the same tier on Linux — and default tooling sometimes nudges you toward Windows.
  • You pay per App Service Plan, not per app: a second plan doubles the bill even if both are nearly idle.
  • The free F1 tier has a hard 60 CPU-minutes/day quota that silently stops your app when exhausted.
  • Ride-along services (Application Insights ingestion, Defender for Cloud) show up as surprise line items.
  • The spending cap only exists on credit subscriptions (free trial, MSDN) — pay-as-you-go has alerts only.

Read the full reviews: Heroku and Azure App Service. Or answer four questions to see what fits your project.